Thursday, August 31, 2023

SCRIPT - The British Conquest of India (1798-1806) IV. The 2nd Anglo-Maratha War: Shinde & Bhonsle

 

The British Conquest of India (1798-1806)

IV. The 2nd Anglo-Maratha War: Shinde & Bhonsle

 


Hi, and welcome to Strategy Stuff. This is Part IV of a five-part series on how Britain and its East India Company, between 1798 and 1807, established a hegemony over South Asia through conquest.

In the last Part, the British had, for better or for worse, begun their reorganization of feudal Indian society, from the establishment of a landed gentry class, to the insistence that everybody follow European standards of political behavior. At the same time, British India continued acquiring and absorbing subsidiary allies, extending its reach further and further into the subcontinent.

Despite these ‘achievements’, however, the chief official of British India, Richard Wellesley the Earl of Mornington, remained unsatisfied. In fact, with the downfall of his political patron back in Britain, he was now under increasing time pressure to fulfill his ambitions, before his bosses in the East India Company removed him from office. This dynamic might have pushed Mornington to make his boldest move yet, and attempt to impose his authority over the great lords of the Maratha Empire.

 

8. Prelude (1802-03)

To be fair, Mornington’s aggression was not the sole cause of the 2nd Anglo-Maratha War. Ever since the 1750s, the Maratha Empire, which dominated most of central, northern and inland India, had entered into a prolonged political decay: first, the Emperor lost power to his Prime Minister or ‘Peshwa’; then the Peshwa lost power to his subordinates, who became independent lords in all but name. By the 1800s, the Empire had practically broken up into 4 domains, each paying only the most nominal lip service to Maratha unity. The Peshwa controlled the Empire’s southwest, while to his northeast lay the lands of the Holkar dynasty. The north, including the city of Delhi, was ruled by the Shinde dynasty, while a branch of the Imperial House of Bhonsle dominated the Empire’s relatively-poor east.

This state of affairs has often been described as a ‘Maratha Confederacy’, but by the 1800s, this term had become misleading. Unlike contemporary confederacies like Switzerland, by this time the Peshwa and his central government had, basically, not even a sliver of authority over the lords, and in fact, were often bullied or even attacked by the latter!

Despite this, Mornington and his officials continued to see the Marathas as a ‘Confederacy’, and in doing so fell into a conceptual trap: by believing that the Maratha lords were still part of a political hierarchy under the Peshwa, it naturally followed that, by seizing the Peshwa, the British would get to control all the Maratha lords. This was a basic misunderstanding of Maratha politics that seems to have occurred in spite of the extensive British spy effort, as we will see, and it goes to show that no amount of intelligence will be helpful, if the interpretation of said intelligence is fundamentally flawed. This would not be the only time that the British made this mistake in the upcoming war.

Turning back to the Marathas: similar to the other indigenous powers, throughout the late 18th Century, the relentless competition between the lords drove each to begin centralizing their governments, both to boost taxation and to create ‘Europeanized’ militaries with the help of European mercenaries. Out of the 4, Shinde and Holkar had made the most progress, thanks to the relative wealth of their lands: by 1800, both states could each field at least 10 thousand Europeanized sepoys, on top of an even larger number of traditional Indian light cavalry. Inevitably, the two became bitter rivals in the struggle for subcontinental hegemony.

A key part of this struggle centered around control over the domain of the young Peshwa, Bajirao II. Initially, the ruler or ‘Maharaja’ of the Shindes, Daulatrao, held sway thanks to his alliance with Bajirao’s regent; but in early 1800, said regent died, and a newly-freed Bajirao began to plot Shinde’s expulsion as well. Naturally, for this task the Peshwa sought out the Holkars and their Maharaja, Yashwantrao.

Holkar went to war with Shinde in early 1801. Initially, operations were limited to the traditional light cavalry raiding along their mutual ‘frontier zone’, but in 1802, the Peshwa abruptly defected back to Shinde’s side. In response, Holkar mobilized his sepoys and marched towards Bajirao’s capital of Pune, where he defeated the combined Peshwa and Shinde armies, chased Bajirao away, and installed his own candidate as the new Peshwa. Dethroned and in grave personal danger, Bajirao fled to the Maratha port of Bassein, near British Bombay, and petitioned Mornington to restore him to power.

On the surface, to have a ruler – or as Mornington saw it, the ruler – of the Marathas deep in Britain’s debt was the opportunity of a lifetime. But with the political winds changing back in London, everybody could see that the Governor-General might not be in office for much longer, and as such they began to voice different opinions. Even Mornington’s own brother, Arthur Wellesley the future Duke of Wellington, cautioned that the Maratha Empire was too quote-unquote ‘rebellious’ to be a useful ally, and stabilizing it would spread British Indian forces dangerously thin across the subcontinent. As mentioned before, neither the pro- nor anti-intervention factions really appreciated that vassalizing the Peshwa would only get them a limited chunk of western India, rather than the whole Empire.

Regardless of the strengthening domestic opposition, Mornington was still in charge and so, on the last day of 1802, he and Bajirao signed what was to be known as the Treaty of Bassein. In it, the British pledged to restore Bajirao as Peshwa, and in return, Bajirao pledged to expel all French personnel from the Maratha Empire, allow an EIC garrison at the capital Pune, and let the British dictate Maratha diplomacy. In so doing, the Treaty turned the Peshwa into a British ‘subsidiary ally’, and by Mornington’s reckoning, that gave him nominal control over the entire Empire and, by extension, almost all of South Asia. Whether this would become actual reality depended, of course, on the success of the upcoming intervention.

For this, Mornington asked the Madras Army to provide a 7-thousand-man contingent, including 2 thousand Europeans, and he further sent another 2 thousand sepoys from newly-vassalized Mysore. Once again, Wellington was put in command of this force: and while this decision was objectively sound, given Wellington’s experience of the region during the Dhondia Wagh campaign, Mornington’s blatant patronage was increasingly galling to senior officers, and as a result it triggered a cascade of resignations within the Madras Army, including its Commander-in-Chief himself!

Undeterred, in March 1803, Wellington set off to restore Bajirao as Peshwa. As expected, the connections he had built up with the local Maratha lords served him well, and the British met no resistance throughout their month-long campaign. Wellington even got the chance to demonstrate the power of his ‘Light and Quick’ strategy, as his cavalry dashed for Pune in the final stretch, surprising Holkar into abandoning the city without a fight! As a result, Bajirao effortlessly reclaimed his throne in May 1803, and the way was open for the British to, equally effortlessly, become the undisputed hegemons of India…

…at least, that was how the British assumed things would turn out. With Peshwa Bajirao restored in Pune, the British now had the displeasure of belatedly discovering that control over him meant very little when it came to vassalizing the other Maratha lords. Part of this was because the Peshwa himself had not regained his throne only to become a British puppet, and as such provided very little help. But in any case, the great lords of the Empire were hardly going to hand over their power at the command of Bajirao, whose authority they, at the best of times, barely acknowledged. Instead, with Holkar withdrawing back to his lands, Shinde and Bhonsle now began marshalling their armies near the Peshwa’s border, drawing out vassalization negotiations with the British in a bid to buy more time to prepare.

At first, Mornington played along, but his initial optimism eroded over the next two months of fruitless and increasingly-deceptive talk. Despite this, his overarching goal remained unchanged: if the Maratha lords could not be vassalized through diplomacy, then the British would impose it on them through force. So in August 1803, Mornington finally delivered an ultimatum to both Shinde and Bhonsle, demanding that they either demobilize immediately or else face war. Neither leader complied, and so a few days later, the 2nd Anglo-Maratha War began.

 

9. The Deccan Campaign (Aug-Dec 1803)

The war between British India and the Marathas was to be fought across the entire Empire, but the decisive campaigns would occur within the two separate theaters of northern and west-central India respectively. The northern or Hindustani theater was dominated by the upper Ganges Plain and included the Mughal capital of Delhi, and would see the EIC’s Bengal Army advance against half of Shinde’s force. That campaign will be the subject of the next chapter.

The focus of this chapter will be on the west-central or Deccan theater. This was where the Peshwa’s capital of Pune was, as well as where half of Shinde’s force and all of Bhonsle’s had initially gathered. The region was the traditional military route between northern and southern India, and as such was dominated by some of the subcontinent’s most renowned forts, each overlooking one of the many rivers that criss-crossed the area. By 1803, however, these fortresses – mostly held by Shinde – had become quite obsolete to modern artillery, and a major monsoonal drought meant that the rivers were not as impassable as they typically were. Instead, the real limiting factor would be the spiking logistics costs due to drought-induced crop failure, which pushed both the Marathas and especially the British to seek a quick decision before the financial strain became unbearable.

As for forces, Wellington had with him the 10 thousand-strong EIC contingent that had restored the Peshwa, and on top of that, he now requested a further 10 thousand cavalry from Hyderabad. Opposing him was the combined army of Shinde and Bhonsle, consisting of 15 thousand sepoys and 40 thousand light cavalry. These impressive Maratha numbers, however, belied a serious problem that was rapidly atrophying their power: as the prospect of actual fighting loomed, many mercenaries, both British and non-British, began to resign from Maratha service. The EIC encouraged and even managed this process, with the most dramatic results occurring over the course of the Hindustan campaign; but even in the Deccan, the loss of mercenary officers sharply reduced the tactical cohesion of Maratha units, while Wellington benefited from the operational intelligence these defectors often provided.

But as mentioned before, all the intelligence in the world cannot help if the interpretation of said intelligence is flawed. Mornington made this mistake in the previous chapter; now, it was his brother’s turn to get the Marathas wrong. This time, the mistake was military: having never really observed Maratha forces in battle, Wellington assumed that they would just be like what he had seen at Mysore, with below-average infantry and artillery, and above-average light cavalry. Based on this, Wellington expected that the Marathas would deploy a light-cavalry-centric strategy, namely the wide-ranging plunder raids that the British had repeatedly insisted was the ‘best’ strategy for indigenous militaries.

Wellington devised his counter-strategy on that basis, which was a version of his ‘Light and Quick’ strategy. Fully expecting that catching the Marathas would be far more difficult than defeating them in battle, Wellington organized his primary force to prioritize speed and aggression, rather than firepower which was to be reserved for the siege train. His primary force would further split itself into 2 columns to cover as much land as possible, with the goal being to quickly identify and pin down enemy concentrations before defeating them in decisive battle.

It was a strategy that worked well against the likes of Dhondia Wagh. But that was precisely the problem: the Marathas were not like Dhondia Wagh. While Shinde and especially Bhonsle did plan to raid the British rear, they primarily sought to repel the British through victory in pitched battle. This reflected Maratha confidence in their mercenary-trained sepoys, who not only fought tenaciously as infantry but – significantly – often outperformed the British when it came to handling artillery. In retrospect, the two rulers probably underestimated the damage that the mercenary exodus was doing to their units, but – being on the strategic defensive – they probably assumed that they could train up adequate replacements while they waited for Wellington’s army to arrive.

The start of the war in August 1803 saw Wellington’s army opposite Ahmadnagar, the first major fort north of the Peshwa’s capital Pune. Historically formidable, Ahmadnagar was by now too obsolete and well-scouted out for Shinde to commit more than a token garrison to its defense, whom Wellington promptly ‘re-hired’ to serve British India after an initial show of force.

Following his ‘Light and Quick’ strategy, Wellington now split his army into 2 lightly-armed columns, and moved northeast towards the estimated position of the Maratha army near Aurangabad, and in the process, taking multiple detours to stop Maratha cavalry from raiding Peshwa or Hyderabad lands. As a result, for the next two months, the British grew dangerously comfortable with both the idea of dispersing their forces, and the belief that the Marathas would stick to traditional light-cavalry warfare.

Finally, in late September, Wellington had narrowed down the location of the Maratha army to the village of Bhokardan, and so his 2 columns, still marching separately, were ordered to re-concentrate there. But as his own column was moving towards Bhokardan, Wellington received updated intelligence that revealed that the 50-thousand-strong Maratha army, including Shinde’s 10 thousand sepoys, was actually concentrated not far from where he was, at the village of Assaye! At this point, Wellington only had about 10 thousand troops with him, half of whom were irregular cavalry unsuited for battle; but everything up to this point, from his preconceived notions to his campaign experience, had led Wellington to see the Maratha infantry as vastly inferior to British arms. He therefore boldly ordered his outnumbered column to attack.

The resulting Battle of Assaye shattered Wellington’s delusions regarding the Marathas. He first tried a flanking approach, only for the Maratha sepoys to redeploy and force him into a frontal assault instead. The Maratha artillery then opened fire, silencing the light British cannon before turning their fury upon the advancing infantry. The Europeans on the right flank, in particular, were decimated, and only by throwing in his entire reserve, and dashing around to rally his troops, did Wellington stabilize his lines enough to get them to the Maratha positions. At that point, the quality of the British Indian troops finally began to tell, and the Marathas were eventually forced to retreat.

In the end, almost 15% of Wellington’s column – or one and a half thousand men – became casualties in the battle; Shinde and Bhonsle lost about 6 thousand total, mostly from the routing baggage train rather than the sepoys themselves. Had the Marathas been in less disarray due to the mercenary exodus, or had Wellington shown poorer crisis leadership, it’s possible that the British would have been defeated outright. But in any event, the Battle of Assaye was an entirely unnecessary risk, one that Wellington took only because he had the wrong idea of how his enemy fought.

Wellington learnt from the experience, and in the weeks after Assaye, he adjusted his strategy to his updated assessment of Maratha capabilities. No longer would he rush to battle the enemy; instead, Wellington’s light forces would now re-focus their efforts on intercepting Maratha raiders, denying them the plunder needed to pay for the rest of Shinde and Bhonsle’s force. At the same time, Wellington would also send the un-bloodied half of his force to capture more of Shinde’s forts, seizing the treasures within and extorting the local population to neutralize them as a resource base. All the while, the EIC’s offer to ‘re-hire’ Maratha sepoys would remain open, and as Shinde and Bhonsle’s funds drained away, more and more of their former soldiers would decide to accept the British deal.

By late November, Shinde had to resort to the same diplomatic ruse that he had used at the start of the war: he asked Wellington for an armistice, hoping to use it to relocate the Marathas to better logistical ground. Wellington agreed, but the British were not to be fooled twice. Taking his entire army this time, Wellington marched towards Shinde’s position, and found the latter army joined up with Bhonsle’s at Argaon, in contravention of armistice terms. The British accordingly attacked, and while they were initially handled roughly by the Maratha artillery again, this time, with better numbers on their side, the result was a definitive victory that shattered Shinde’s force in the Deccan. All that was left to do was for Wellington to press the advance up to Bhonsle’s fortress at Gawilghur, which was quickly stormed and emptied of all its treasures. Not long after, with few resources left to maintain their existing force – to say nothing of replacing past losses – Shinde and Bhonsle finally decided to sue for peace.

The Deccan Campaign marked the height of Wellington’s career in India, though as we’ve seen, it was hardly a stellar performance from the future ‘Iron Duke’. Nevertheless, his strategy achieved what it needed to do in the theater: in 5 months, British India had seized overall control of the Deccan and its military routes, strengthening its protection – and domination – of both Hyderabad and the Maratha Peshwa. Mornington had no greater ambitions for this region which, after all, was meant to be a sideshow to the main event occurring up north…

 

10. The Hindustan Campaign (1803)

As implied in the previous chapters, when Mornington pondered whether to vassalize the Maratha Peshwa or not, he was not really focused on the value of the Peshwa’s fairly-marginal and war-torn domain. Instead, he was far more interested in the Maratha holdings in the upper Ganges Plain, especially the region around Delhi, then known as Hindustan.

Fabled for its wealth and splendor, Mornington expected that Hindustan’s capture would more than cover all the extra costs incurred during his Governor-Generalship, and therefore finally redeem his Reformist policies in the eyes of his Mercantilist bosses back in London. Equally importantly, Delhi was also where the Mughal Emperor was, and while – as mentioned in Part I – the Emperor wielded little actual power, controlling him would let the British channel his great prestige to legitimize their rule throughout the subcontinent. Furthermore – though the British didn’t know this at the time – controlling Hindustan would also allow the British to dominate the petty kings of neighboring Rajputana, whose tribute, fueled by the regional caravan trade network, was actually an easier source of income than Hindustan, whose wealth was largely dispersed amongst the feudal aristocracy.

At the start of August 1803, Hindustan was held by the great Maratha lord, Daulatrao Shinde, who used its aforementioned advantages to field a formidable sepoy army, half of which we’ve already seen in the Deccan. The other half of Shinde’s force – numbering 15 thousand sepoys and 20 thousand light cavalry – was under the command of the French mercenary general Perron, who was now tasked with defending the region against the invasion of the EIC’s Bengal Army.

Led by General Gerard Lake, the Bengal Army – numbering about 10 thousand soldiers, including several thousand Europeans – had spent much of 1802 suppressing a rebellion right on the Hindustani border, so the outbreak of war saw it well-positioned for an immediate attack, just like in the Deccan. But unlike Wellington, Lake seems to have held a respectful opinion of Maratha capabilities from the start. This is not too surprising, given that both his and Shinde’s sepoys basically came from the same population, and in many cases had even served in the opposing army! But no matter where it came from, Lake’s realistic enemy assessment would do much to create an effective strategy for the upcoming campaign.

True to its name, the upper Ganges Plain is relatively flat throughout, with deserts or hills only emerging at the edges. The great rivers of the region – the Ganges in the north, the Yamuna in the center, and the Chambal to the south – were therefore the main obstacles to movement, but the monsoonal drought that was afflicting the Deccan at this time was also afflicting the region, which meant that the rivers posed no real challenge for either side. Similarly, the defenses of the region – including the famous Red Forts of Delhi and Agra – were hopelessly obsolete, given modern artillery and the limited number of troops fielded by both sides. So there was little stopping Lake from going where he pleased, but the same also held for the other side, with the Marathas – or any other opportunistic ruler on the borderlands – potentially able to strike wherever, whenever.

Mornington had already given Lake a potential out, by allowing the Bengal Army to prioritize capturing Delhi over the defense of even Bengal itself. Nevertheless – similar to the underlying logic behind Wellington’s ‘Light and Quick’ strategy – Lake ultimately decided that aggression, right from the start, would give him the best chance to drive events towards a quick decision, rather than a long, expensive stalemate. Unlike Wellington’s initial instincts, however, Lake was not about to charge straight at the Maratha army. Rather, more like Wellington’s later instincts, Lake would focus first on the denial of Maratha raiding and the capture of local forts, pinning down and starving out Shinde’s soldiers in the process, until the Bengal Army could easily defeat them with minimal risk.

Lake’s strategy would be helped by a truly impressive example of military subversion from Mornington. Despite pushing for the ‘Europeanization’ of the subcontinent, the Governor-General was nevertheless interested in exploiting the mercenary attitude prevalent in South Asian military culture at the time, especially the practice of ‘re-hiring’ soldiers to fight for a new side! And of course, the people who most exemplified this attitude were… the European mercenaries, in fact, for whom profit was the sole purpose of their service.

Mornington had used subversion from the moment he arrived in India. But what he was about to do in Hindustan dwarfed anything done previously: even before the Maratha war broke out, and while his emissaries were still negotiating with Shinde, Mornington’s spies had already made secret offers to the mercenary leaders of Hindustan, up to and including the Maratha commander, General Perron himself!

Raising the real fear of an unprofitable death on one hand, while offering a wad of EIC shares to be sold back in Europe on the other, Mornington had, in fact, secured Perron’s allegiance a full two months before hostilities began! Similar efforts occurred at all levels of the mercenary hierarchy, triggering a cascade of defections and self-sabotage that a bewildered Shinde, despite his best efforts, was unable to stop. Like in the Deccan Campaign, the results severely compromised Maratha tactical cohesion, but this was not the only outcome of Mornington’s subversion in Hindustan.

After war broke out in August 1803, Lake spent a month finalizing his preparations before advancing first against the major fort of Aligarh. On the way, he clashed with Shinde’s army under the compromised General Perron, who put up a token resistance before falling back. This behavior finally confirmed Perron’s unreliability to Shinde, and in response, the Maratha lord hastily appointed a new French mercenary, Bourquin, to command. But unbeknownst to Shinde, this introduced an entirely new dynamic into the Maratha army: that of the French Revolution, since Bourquin supported the Revolution while most of his compatriots remained Royalist. As a result, the Maratha army in Hindustan split into pro- and anti-Bourquin factions, stoking mutual suspicion and hostility amongst the sepoys that persisted even after the French had left.

Meanwhile, Lake had taken advantage of all this to storm Aligarh in a tough fight, after which he steadily proceeded up the road to Delhi. By mid-September, Bourquin was finally forced to offer battle before the city’s gates: and while the individual Maratha sepoy and especially artilleryman fought capably, their tattered command hardly exercised any overall control, and the British were able to use a feigned retreat to lure the Marathas out and then decimate them. Delhi surrendered a few days later, and with it, British India not only became the new regents for the Mughal Emperor, but also obtained the surrender of a few sepoy units and even Bourquin himself, who was now sent back to Europe along with Perron.

Lake remained in Delhi for a while longer, ‘re-hiring’ Shinde sepoys to serve in the garrisons while also conducting diplomacy with neighboring Rajput rulers. Finally, in early October, he marched to capture the second city of Hindustan, Agra. There, he was again met with a Maratha army in chaos, as the sepoys inside Agra’s Red Fort locked out the reinforcements sent to strengthen them. Inevitably, both armies were soon defeated in detail, and with Agra’s fall, Lake was now in overall control of Hindustan, having suffered barely more casualties than Wellington had done at the Battle of Assaye alone.

All that was left to do was to remove the remnants of Shinde’s army from the region, which occurred a few days later, as Lake located and attacked the retreating Marathas at Laswari. Once again, the individual Maratha soldier fought hard, but by this time, they were far too small and demoralized to do anything more than delay the inevitable. With their defeat and subsequent dispersal, Shinde’s power was definitively broken, not just in Hindustan, but also in Rajputana, whose petty rulers now flocked to place themselves under EIC protection.

*

The bulk of British India’s military effort during the 2nd Anglo-Maratha War was made in the Deccan and Hindustan Campaigns, but all across central India, small detachments also launched their own attacks, particularly on the coasts, which Mornington wanted sealed off from non-British influence. By the end of December 1803, British India had reached a territorial extent not seen since the height of Mughal rule a century before: it directly or indirectly controlled almost everything between Delhi and the subcontinent’s southern tip; and between Gujarat to Bengal. This represented more than a quadrupling of EIC territory, and all this was achieved within a mere 6 years.

At this point, it must have seemed that all there was left for Mornington to do was to formally declare the EIC’s full hegemony. With the might of Shinde and Bhonsle broken, both rulers had no choice but to sign subsidiary alliance treaties with British India. And despite the stated casus belli of the 2nd Anglo-Maratha War – which was to get the Maratha lords to submit to the authority of the vassalized Peshwa – the treaties also formalized the breakup of the Maratha Empire, as they sharply limited the Peshwa’s power over the defeated lords, while mandating that all future communication between them be conducted via the British. And with the vassalization of the Marathas, there was really nobody else on the subcontinent with the ability to even approach the power that Mornington now wielded.

But all was not as it seemed, and in fact, Mornington was slowly being overwhelmed by a multitude of problems. First, he was increasingly at odds with his officials and even his brother Wellington, who by now were fully opposed to further expansion and the overextension of EIC resources that it entailed. Second, the first reports on Hindustan were also coming in, and they definitely did not show the region as the land of easy tax and tribute that Mornington portrayed it as. This directly led to the third problem, as the enraged Directors of the EIC, furious at being duped again, were now lobbying the new Prime Minister to remove Mornington, and slowly but surely, they were succeeding.

But fourth and perhaps most ominously, the British were rather mistaken in assuming that they had secured full control over the entire Maratha Empire. After all, there was still one domain that they had not formally subjugated yet – that of Holkar.

*

Thanks for watching the video, and please like, subscribe and hit the bell button! If you have any questions, I’ll be happy to answer them in the comments section. This is Part IV of a five-part series: Part V will go over the war with Holkar, as well as provide a conclusion to things.

Saturday, August 19, 2023

SCRIPT - The British Conquest of India (1798-1806) III. Colonial Reorganization

 

The British Conquest of India (1798-1806)

III. Colonial Reorganization

 


Hi, and welcome to Strategy Stuff. This is Part III of a five-part series on how, between 1798 and 1807, Britain and its East India Company established a hegemony over India through conquest.

In the last Part, the chief official of British India, Richard Wellesley the Earl of Mornington, had just conquered the south Indian power of Mysore and suppressed the resistance of its feudal lords. Now, with unquestioned authority over their territory, Mornington and his reform-minded colleagues began to use that authority to reorganize feudal Indian society along ‘rational’ Enlightenment principles, not just to render India more accessible to European exploitation, but also to increase the subcontinent’s level of development. Both were ultimately meant to achieve what Mornington had promised his skeptical bosses back in London: a boost to the profit of the East India Company and its shareholders.

 

6. Societal Reorganization

Mornington had come to British India with two policy directions in mind: first, territorial expansion, and second, reorganizing Indian society to establish a quote-unquote ‘rational’ and Europeanized order. As a recently-conquered territory, Mysore was the perfect testing ground for both. First came the territorial expansion: accordingly, the British first annexed Mysore’s coastline, then awarded border territories to Hyderabad and the Maratha Empire. The remainder was to be turned into a subsidiary ally – and now British officials were free to focus on their other work of societal reorganization.

So what was the British goal here? As mentioned in Part I of the video series, British Reformists, following Enlightenment philosophy, believed that the purpose of government was to establish a ‘rational’ order over society. Furthermore, they equated ‘rational’ order with the rule of the landed gentry, whose status as both educated aristocrats and local leaders meant that they would best understand and act in the collective interest. This was in contrast to the partisan tyranny that the British associated with central bureaucracies, exemplified in Revolutionary France where society was being repeatedly destroyed and rebuilt depending on who controlled Paris at the time. But before British Reformists could even start on their ambition, they first had to answer a basic question: who actually belonged to the Indian landed gentry?

In some places, the answer was obvious. Swathes of annexed territory were given to those who had helped the British, while the original Hindu dynasty was restored in subsidiary Mysore alongside the lords that Tipu Sultan had repressed. But in the rest of rural India, the British had the choice of several groups, all of whom held some power under feudalism. There were village leaders whom indigenous rulers had designated to collect tax; village scribes who were designated to audit the collection of the tax; and otherwise unconnected officials whose pay the tax had been earmarked for. Communal, clan and religious organizations also had a say in village governance, not to mention the various exiles who now petitioned the new regime to restore their former status.

Faced with this complicated social mosaic that they had neither the understanding nor manpower to fully oversee, the British ultimately decided to boil it all down to two principles which, not entirely coincidentally, also structured power in rural Britain. First, local leadership and gentryhood would be reserved for those who owned the most local land. Secondly and more significantly, whether somebody owned land or not depended on whether they had the legal documents that proved their ownership.

From a present-day perspective, an emphasis on written documentation might seem like the hallmark of a ‘modern’ or ‘rational’ legal system. But the rough imposition of this principle upon a largely illiterate society with its own pre-existing feudal traditions inevitably had huge social repercussions.

Here, the British insistence on documentation unsurprisingly favored people with access to such things. First, there were the village leaders who, while often illiterate, were rich enough to pay for scribes; second, there was the caste of literate scribes, who were now in an ideal position to demonstrate or even forge land claims; and third, there was the caste of equally-literate Brahmins who could now also secure and expand the holdings of their religious institutions.

Thanks to the new principles set out by British Reformism, from here on out all three groups, as the new gentry class of India, would not only cement their position at the top of the social and caste hierarchy, but – similar to the enclosure movement that was gaining steam in Britain at the time – they would also abuse their literacy advantage to expropriate land that, under feudalism, was commonly- or independently-owned. All this would largely come at the expense of the illiterate peasants and lower castes, whose unwritten rights and traditions largely went unrecognized under the British legal system. As a result, most were either forced out onto increasingly-unproductive lands, or else became tenant farmers who now had to pay rent to the gentry, on top of their existing burdens.

Still, however imperfectly, the British now had their landed gentry, so the next step was to incentivize this class to cooperate with the overarching goal of colonial exploitation. In most cases, this was done via a basic bargain: if the gentry would facilitate British administration and especially help collect British taxes, the British would step back and let them assume near-unchecked powers over local life. This was a marked shift from feudal practice, where rulers often intervened in favor of the peasants to balance out the feudal lords.

The British bargain not only coopted the gentry into being a free local government for British India, but was also aligned with what Reformists initially saw as the ideal societal order. As a result, throughout this period British India de-centralized power at the local level, undoing much of the progress that indigenous states had made in reducing the power of the feudal lords. Many British officials trumpeted this process as a ‘gift’ to the Indian populace, seeing it as removing the onerous burdens of the quote-unquote ‘corrupt’ indigenous governments. In reality, Indian peasants quickly discovered that these were replaced by the even more onerous burdens of the local gentry, ranging from extortionate rents to compulsory services to making the poor pay the lion’s share of the local tax quota.

So the local gentry wasn’t as socially responsible as idealized, but that wasn’t meant to be the only upside to a Reformist order. In freeing the gentry from the arbitrary demands of central government, British Reformists also expected that the former would now proactively develop their lands, leading to an improvement in the British Indian economy – as well as for EIC profits.

This thinking lay behind another social innovation that the British sought to implement in India: secure property rights. Under Indian feudalism, lords were not guaranteed ownership over their lands; instead, they only had a grant from the ruler, who technically could revoke it at any time. To the British, such a system was inherently arbitrary and discouraged the gentry from making long-term improvements to their lands, so they sought to rectify this via yet another bargain with them.

The most famous example of such a bargain was the so-called ‘Permanent Settlement’ of Bengal in the 1790s, where the British pledged never to arbitrarily expropriate gentry land, so long as the gentry again paid the land tax on time. In fact, the EIC even agreed never to increase the land tax, which might seem counter-intuitive for exploitation, but this was because the British expected that, thanks to the guarantees contained within the Permanent Settlement, the gentry would now feel secure enough to develop Bengal into a significant market for taxable EIC goods!

Just like the emphasis on documentation, secure property rights are regarded as a hallmark for a ‘modern’ or ‘rational’ economy. But the rough way in which the British implemented this concept in Bengal again led to huge repercussions that ultimately contributed to a major failure of expectations.

The problem again lay in the Reformist over-idealization of what the gentry was willing to do. More so than in Europe, India’s agricultural productivity depended on a well-maintained irrigation infrastructure to manage the often-unpredictable monsoons. Under feudalism, the ruler was responsible for their maintenance, but now the British believed that, having introduced secure property rights, they could pass on this burden onto the newly-incentivized gentry instead.

In doing so, they overlooked the basic economic failure – albeit poorly understood at the time – known as the ‘free-rider problem’. Since the presence of irrigation infrastructure provided equal benefits to everyone regardless of contribution, every gentleman was incentivized to shirk responsibility for its maintenance and rely on others to contribute instead. So eventually, nobody maintained anything, and the result was general agricultural decay and a steep decline in peasant conditions.

By the time Governor-General Mornington was in charge during the 1800s, the impoverishment of the Bengal peasantry was already too embarrassing for the British to replicate the Permanent Settlement for southern India. Instead, officials introduced an adjusted system where the EIC, rather than letting the gentry seize everything, would instead keep some of the land to directly rent it out to peasants.

For this system to work, the EIC had to know what land it actually owned, and so Mornington’s officials – including his brother Wellington – began surveying every land plot under their control, kicking off a monster project that would take almost 7 decades to finish. As a side-effect, this would also give British India an unprecedented amount of data on the subcontinent, laying the groundwork for ‘modern’ policymaking based on analysis of objective evidence, which marked yet another step in the ‘Europeanization’ of South Asian government.

But despite all the work, however, Mornington’s new Reformist system still failed to meet expectations. This time, it was not over-idealism which was to blame, but instead cold, hard politics. The British Indian gentry rightly saw these surveys and direct rentals as an attempt to curb or bypass their power, and so, just like in feudal times, they mobilized in opposition, threatening disobedience or even rebellion. By this time, British officials were fully aware of how the gentry abused the peasantry – though they still blamed it on ‘corruption’ rather than on anything they themselves did – but at the same time, the British also understood that their rule over India was easiest achieved if they kept to the initial gentry bargains. So the British re-diluted their system to favor the gentry, most notably by placing the latter back in charge of collecting the rents, and as a result, southern India also spiraled into a cycle of rural abuse, debt and peasant misery.

Behind these repeated policy and social failures was the EIC’s fundamental need to exploit the subcontinent for profit: the Company demanded high taxes from both the gentry and peasantry, with little relief even during times of severe economic crisis. But the way colonial exploitation worked was significantly more sophisticated than the ‘orgy of pillage’ that British rule is often caricatured as. Rather, just like colonial America, British officials used India as a ‘policy lab’ where they could experiment with local society and, hopefully, find ways to improve administration efficiency or stimulate development. After all, it was much better to fatten the golden goose than to kill it outright, and to that end the British introduced various social innovations whose worth is still recognized today as part of South Asia’s transition into so-called ‘modernity’.

In that case, why did British colonialism in India fall so short of the Reformist ideal, especially given the British success in developing colonial America? Perhaps the biggest difference is that, unlike in America, the British had neither the capability nor the intention to erase South Indian indigenous society and start off with a ‘blank slate’. That meant that, instead of societal construction, the British in India were trying to do societal reorganization, a task whose complexity was arguably beyond the capabilities of any government at the time. When British Indian officials tried to implement their pro-gentry utopia, they neither had the knowledge to fully appreciate the ramifications of their policies, nor the administrative capacity to ensure that the local gentry conformed to their expectations. As such, instead of British policies changing Indian society towards Reformist ideals, British policies instead were used by local elites to intensify India’s feudal and hierarchical structures.

The result was an India that was the opposite of what Reformists intended. Rural abuse and underinvestment became commonplace, and in their wake came misery, debt slavery, and famine. In the coming decades, frequent war, British imports and finally industrial restrictions would further add to the subcontinent’s woes, ultimately leading to deurbanization, stagnation and grinding poverty. As an example, the tax revenue Tipu Sultan collected from Mysore in 1799 would not be reached again until 1860.

Many British Indian officials were genuinely upset at these results, which implied that British rule was inferior to what had come before. But there was no question of returning to feudalism, nor of stopping colonial exploitation: instead, the only solution was further reform, and already in Mornington’s day, many had begun to argue that India’s condition would improve once Parliament abolished the EIC’s monopoly over subcontinental trade. In any case, the British were also hard at work reforming India’s regional order, as Mornington endeavored to replace the existing feudal hierarchy with a new, Europeanized and British-led one.

 

7. Regional Reorganization (1799-1802)

In two short years, Mornington had eliminated two of India’s top indigenous powers: Hyderabad through vassalization, Mysore through conquest. This feat was more than enough to place him amongst the subcontinent’s greatest conquerors, but the Governor-General’s ambitions, much like his French contemporary Napoleon, were boundless. In fact, shortly after the conquest of Mysore, Mornington received something that he interpreted as an insulting reminder of his insignificance: Prime Minister Pitt and the British Government had honored him with a new aristocratic title, but it was one under the less-prestigious Peerage of Ireland, rather than that of Great Britain.

Furious, Mornington decided that he needed more ‘achievements’ in the form of conquests and annexations. But to be fair, anger was not his only reason for resuming expansion: after all, the Reformist project to ‘Europeanize’ India was in full swing, and it was hardly compatible with British India’s continued subservience to the existing feudal regional order. The only real question was: who to target first?

Sensibly, Mornington first targeted the most vulnerable members of the regional order: the subsidiary allies of the EIC. On paper, these states had no real ability to act against the British, but they were still Indian states whose idea of legitimate behavior was rooted within Indian, not European, political culture. And as mentioned in Part I, a characteristic of Indian political culture was its comparatively relaxed attitude with regards to information, with courts and officials regularly sharing news and gossip with other states, even rivals. To those used to it, this was a perfectly reasonable way to manage relations, build trust and reduce misunderstanding, and up until now, the British were willing to tolerate this practice.

Given this, it was standard for these subsidiary allies, particularly in southern India, to maintain contact with Tipu Sultan throughout the 4th Anglo-Mysore War. But Mornington wanted an excuse, and such behavior provided the best justification – from a European perspective – for what he was about to do. Denouncing the contacts of these subsidiary allies as quote-unquote ‘treason’, Mornington demanded, as punishment, that their rulers transfer control over their entire administration to the EIC. With no real means of resistance, the rulers folded, and much of what was once only indirectly held in southern India now fell under direct British rule. A similar accusation also led to the annexation of much of the middle Ganges in northern India, with the offending contact this time being with the Afghans. In the process, the British sent out a clear signal: from here on out, subsidiary allies were to behave according to European standards of political behavior.

This was perhaps not the best advertisement for being a British subsidiary ally, but undeterred, Mornington still hoped to acquire more of them. As the case of Hyderabad showed, a succession crisis was a particularly perilous time for any Indian prince or state, and as such represented an ideal opportunity for the British to present their demands, up to and including vassalization. This time, the succession crisis was in Gujarat in western India, which was nominally part of the Maratha Empire. One son asked the British to support his succession, Mornington sent in the Bombay Army along with a subsidiary alliance request, and soon yet another slice of India came under indirect EIC control. Mornington did not neglect his Europeanizing mission: Gujarat was specifically asked to stop any further independent contact with their Maratha overlord, and instead rely on British India to transmit any future communications.

Amidst all this subcontinental activity, it can be difficult to remember that Britain was still locked in a broader struggle against Revolutionary France, but that war did occasionally intrude into Mornington’s plans. Perhaps the most significant episode occurred in late 1800, when Mornington was ordered to send a detachment to the southern island of Ceylon, where it could then operate against French, Spanish and Dutch colonies around the Indian Ocean. This was a low-risk, high-plunder job, and accordingly, Mornington again tried to place his brother Wellington in command. But this time, the payout was too high for the senior commanders to accept this patronage abuse, and Wellington was forced into a humiliating climbdown. The detachment was eventually sent to French-occupied Egypt, where it played a minor role in restoring that territory to the Ottoman Empire.

Far more important to Mornington was the situation back at the home front, since his position as Governor-General relied entirely on the continued patronage of Prime Minister Pitt. But in early 1801, Pitt abruptly resigned as Prime Minister over the fallout arising from the union of Great Britain and Ireland, and as a result Mornington’s political cover disappeared overnight.

Almost immediately, the Directors of the EIC, who as Mercantilists had always opposed Mornington’s Reformist and expansionist policies, began to interfere with the Governor-General’s plans. They vetoed his proposals for further colonial reforms, and even began removing Reformist officials from office, including another brother of the Governor-General himself! Things got so bad that in 1802, Mornington would write the first of several threatened resignations, hoping to buy some more time to fulfill just another ambition in India. And this one would, undoubtedly, be his biggest challenge to date…

*

Thanks for watching the video, and please like, subscribe and hit the bell button! If you have any questions, I’ll be happy to answer them in the comments section. This is Part III of a five-part series: Part IV will be about the Second Anglo-Maratha War.